header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Child care U-turn

Coalition brings back child care court fees hike

The government has reversed the abolition of the increase to court fees for child care cases, which means local authorities now face court fees of £4,825 rather than £150 in care and supervision hearings.

Jonathan Djanogly, Ministry of Justice minister, made the surprise U-turn last week.

The previous government faced stiff opposition when it decided to raise the fees by 3,000% in 2008. Former Justice Secretary Jack Straw abolished the fees plan following a concerted campaign by the Law Society, Bar Council and children’s charities who feared children might be left in dangerous family situations, and a legal challenge that was later rejected by the courts.
In a written statement this week, however, Djanogly says: “Protecting vulnerable children is paramount and I do not believe that continuing to charge these court fees will place vulnerable children at risk.

“Local authorities have a statutory duty to investigate instances when they suspect a child is suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm and it would be unlawful for local authorities to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll