header-logo header-logo

11 August 2023 / Catherine Doherty Montanaro
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Child maintenance: finding the formula

133401
The calculation of child maintenance for parents in higher income brackets has been clarified—if not simplified—by the High Court: Catherine Doherty sets out what this means for family practitioners
  • In an appendix to the judgment in James v Seymour, Mr Justice Mostyn set out his proposed formula for the calculation of child maintenance.
  • The conflict between this formulaic approach and the discretionary balancing exercise preferred by other members of the judiciary will be familiar to family practitioners.

On 19 April 2023, Mr Justice Mostyn handed down judgment in James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 28 (May), an appeal brought by a mother of the judgment of Judge Vincent dated 6 December 2022 (A wife v A husband [2022] EWFC 154).

Background

The mother was aged 50 and a journalist (but was not working at the time of the appeal). The respondent was the mother’s ex-husband (aged 47, working in private equity) and father of their two children, aged 12 and 10.

Both

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll