header-logo header-logo

11 August 2023 / Catherine Doherty Montanaro
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Child maintenance: finding the formula

133401
The calculation of child maintenance for parents in higher income brackets has been clarified—if not simplified—by the High Court: Catherine Doherty sets out what this means for family practitioners
  • In an appendix to the judgment in James v Seymour, Mr Justice Mostyn set out his proposed formula for the calculation of child maintenance.
  • The conflict between this formulaic approach and the discretionary balancing exercise preferred by other members of the judiciary will be familiar to family practitioners.

On 19 April 2023, Mr Justice Mostyn handed down judgment in James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 28 (May), an appeal brought by a mother of the judgment of Judge Vincent dated 6 December 2022 (A wife v A husband [2022] EWFC 154).

Background

The mother was aged 50 and a journalist (but was not working at the time of the appeal). The respondent was the mother’s ex-husband (aged 47, working in private equity) and father of their two children, aged 12 and 10.

Both

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll