header-logo header-logo

Child maintenance: finding the formula

11 August 2023 / Catherine Doherty Montanaro
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
133401
The calculation of child maintenance for parents in higher income brackets has been clarified—if not simplified—by the High Court: Catherine Doherty sets out what this means for family practitioners
  • In an appendix to the judgment in James v Seymour, Mr Justice Mostyn set out his proposed formula for the calculation of child maintenance.
  • The conflict between this formulaic approach and the discretionary balancing exercise preferred by other members of the judiciary will be familiar to family practitioners.

On 19 April 2023, Mr Justice Mostyn handed down judgment in James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 28 (May), an appeal brought by a mother of the judgment of Judge Vincent dated 6 December 2022 (A wife v A husband [2022] EWFC 154).

Background

The mother was aged 50 and a journalist (but was not working at the time of the appeal). The respondent was the mother’s ex-husband (aged 47, working in private equity) and father of their two children, aged 12 and 10.

Both

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll