header-logo header-logo

03 March 2021 / Kim Beatson , Victoria Rylatt
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law
printer mail-detail

Child relocation in review

41400
Kim Beatson & Victoria Brown analyse recent relocation cases & lay out some practical advice
  • Overview of the legal framework surrounding relocation and an update on relevant case law, including the position in the UK post-Brexit.
  • Practical matters and making the application.

Child relocation cases are difficult, often finely balanced cases with everything to win and lose. These are expensive to run and require detailed preparation by the applicant (see box out). The legal framework is covered in impressive detail in the case of TC and JC (Children: Relocation), Re [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 316 (Feb), which was a mother’s application for leave to permanently remove two young children to Australia. It is quite an unusual case in that the parents had agreed that, whatever decision the judge made, the unsuccessful parent would travel to live in that country. So, it is not as heart-breaking as some other cases.

In TC and JC, Mr Justice Mostyn analysed the legal framework, dealing with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll