header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Features , Practice areas , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman (EAT, 10 December 2008)

Peter Hungerford-Welch, associate dean, The City Law School, City University London. W www.city.ac.uk/law
 

The narrower comparator favoured by the majority in Malcolm v Lewisham LBC [2008] UKHL 43, [2008] 1 AC 1399, in disability-related discrimination claims in the housing context, applies equally in the employment context. The wider comparator used in Clark v TDG Ltd (t/a Novacold Ltd) [1999] 2 All ER 977 should no longer apply (unless and until the legislation is further amended).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll