header-logo header-logo

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Child support second charge

What is the current state of thinking about the efficacy of a second charge...

What is the current state of thinking about the efficacy of a second charge against the former matrimonial home under a financial remedies order where the resident parent is agreeing not to claim child support in return for preserving the property and the non-resident parent wishes to ensure he does not suffer double jeopardy? The charge would be for a sum equivalent to any child support the non-resident parent ends up having to pay.

Any agreement not to claim child maintenance or to repay any sums paid under a maintenance calculation would be unenforceable on public policy grounds. While parties are free to agree whatever financial arrangement they wish, we suggest the court should not give its approval to such an arrangement and that the charge would be set aside on challenge.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll