header-logo header-logo

13 July 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Childcare (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2011

Amend the Childcare (Fees) Regulations 2008, SI 2008/1804, which prescribe application fees and annual fees payable by registered childcare providers to Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (“the Chief Inspector”).

Amend the Childcare (Fees) Regulations 2008, SI 2008/1804, which prescribe application fees and annual fees payable by registered childcare providers to Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (“the Chief Inspector”). The amendment extends the operation of the transitional provision which ensured that childcare providers (other than childminders) who were automatically transferred on 1 September 2008 from the previous childcare register onto the Early Years Register paid a lower annual fee than would otherwise be the case. By extending the effect of the transitional provision for a further year to 31 August 2012 this group will continue to pay the lower annual fee; otherwise it would increase substantially for them from 1 September 2011. No changes are made to the level of other fees prescribed by SI 2008/1804.

In force: 1 September 2011

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll