header-logo header-logo

01 May 2019
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Expert Witness , Fees , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Children left without experts

Fee rates leave social workers unable to afford to take on legal aid cases

A shortage of expert witnesses is putting vulnerable children at risk, a social workers’ group has warned.

The Legal Aid Agency confirmed in April that fees for reports by independent social workers will remain at their 2013 rate of £33 per hour, in its ‘Guidance on the remuneration of expert witnesses’. By comparison, legal aid rates for ‘employment consultant’ experts are £54.40 per hour, while midwives and computer experts are paid £72 per hour.

Social worker experts provide independent opinions on the best interests of a child in high-stakes cases where the family court is deciding whether the child should be removed from his or her family, be fostered or adopted, or continue to have contact with their parent. The expert will not usually be paid for more than 30 hours work including reading all the evidence, conducting interviews with all significant parties and writing the report.

According to independent social workers’ organisation Nagalro, however, many experts spend considerably more than 30 hours on each case.

Nagalro chair Sukhchandan Kaur said: ‘Many of our members, who bring with them post-graduate qualifications and tens of years of front-line experience, are left feeling that the government does not value their skills, or the work which they can do, but is still happy to take advantage of their commitment to vulnerable and disadvantaged children.

‘An increasing number are taking the sad and reluctant decision that they can no longer afford to take on legal aid cases. Others say that they are not able to undertake a reliable assessment due to the limit on the number of hours.’

In November 2018, the president of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, told delegates at the Bond Solon Experts Conference that cases are being delayed because of a national shortage of experts willing to accept cases at the prescribed rates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll