header-logo header-logo

Children left without experts

01 May 2019
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Expert Witness , Fees , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Fee rates leave social workers unable to afford to take on legal aid cases

A shortage of expert witnesses is putting vulnerable children at risk, a social workers’ group has warned.

The Legal Aid Agency confirmed in April that fees for reports by independent social workers will remain at their 2013 rate of £33 per hour, in its ‘Guidance on the remuneration of expert witnesses’. By comparison, legal aid rates for ‘employment consultant’ experts are £54.40 per hour, while midwives and computer experts are paid £72 per hour.

Social worker experts provide independent opinions on the best interests of a child in high-stakes cases where the family court is deciding whether the child should be removed from his or her family, be fostered or adopted, or continue to have contact with their parent. The expert will not usually be paid for more than 30 hours work including reading all the evidence, conducting interviews with all significant parties and writing the report.

According to independent social workers’ organisation Nagalro, however, many experts spend considerably more than 30 hours on each case.

Nagalro chair Sukhchandan Kaur said: ‘Many of our members, who bring with them post-graduate qualifications and tens of years of front-line experience, are left feeling that the government does not value their skills, or the work which they can do, but is still happy to take advantage of their commitment to vulnerable and disadvantaged children.

‘An increasing number are taking the sad and reluctant decision that they can no longer afford to take on legal aid cases. Others say that they are not able to undertake a reliable assessment due to the limit on the number of hours.’

In November 2018, the president of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, told delegates at the Bond Solon Experts Conference that cases are being delayed because of a national shortage of experts willing to accept cases at the prescribed rates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll