header-logo header-logo

Children suffering as cases drag on

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-detail
Families and children are waiting two years to have their cases resolved, a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has found

The report, ‘Improving family court services for children’, published last week, considers both public and private family law proceedings involving children. It found the statutory time limit for public law cases of within 26 weeks has never been met nationally since it was introduced in 2014.

As of December 2024, more than 4,000 children were in proceedings lasting nearly two years or sometimes more. Delays breed delays as evidence and assessments need to be updated, and costs grow. For example, between 2018 and 2022, average spending on legal aid for a case brought by a local authority doubled, from about £6,000 to about £12,000, mainly due to cases taking longer. The NAO assessed this as representing an annual increase of £314m in legal aid spending for these cases.

There is regional variation—Wales performs best, with averages of 24 weeks for public cases and 18 weeks for private cases. London, on the other hand, averaged 53 weeks and 70 weeks, respectively.

However, complex accountability arrangements and limited information on the biggest causes of delays make it difficult to target improvements, the NAO found.

Nevertheless, the NAO noted the pathfinder pilot currently underway in five areas has yielded promising results to date.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, urged the government to ‘spend to save’ by investing in pathfinder courts.

‘While local authority costs increased in the pilots, direct judicial costs halved,’ Mills said. She called for ‘a much more joined-up approach’ and highlighted that one party in four out of ten cases last year was unrepresented.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘When cases are resolved quickly, fewer complexities develop and fewer court applications are needed, reducing overall costs to the taxpayer.’

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll