header-logo header-logo

Children suffering as cases drag on

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-detail
Families and children are waiting two years to have their cases resolved, a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has found

The report, ‘Improving family court services for children’, published last week, considers both public and private family law proceedings involving children. It found the statutory time limit for public law cases of within 26 weeks has never been met nationally since it was introduced in 2014.

As of December 2024, more than 4,000 children were in proceedings lasting nearly two years or sometimes more. Delays breed delays as evidence and assessments need to be updated, and costs grow. For example, between 2018 and 2022, average spending on legal aid for a case brought by a local authority doubled, from about £6,000 to about £12,000, mainly due to cases taking longer. The NAO assessed this as representing an annual increase of £314m in legal aid spending for these cases.

There is regional variation—Wales performs best, with averages of 24 weeks for public cases and 18 weeks for private cases. London, on the other hand, averaged 53 weeks and 70 weeks, respectively.

However, complex accountability arrangements and limited information on the biggest causes of delays make it difficult to target improvements, the NAO found.

Nevertheless, the NAO noted the pathfinder pilot currently underway in five areas has yielded promising results to date.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, urged the government to ‘spend to save’ by investing in pathfinder courts.

‘While local authority costs increased in the pilots, direct judicial costs halved,’ Mills said. She called for ‘a much more joined-up approach’ and highlighted that one party in four out of ten cases last year was unrepresented.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘When cases are resolved quickly, fewer complexities develop and fewer court applications are needed, reducing overall costs to the taxpayer.’

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll