header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Features , Contract , Procedure & practice , Banking
printer mail-detail

Choose your contract wording carefully

182206
Nicholas Dobson relays the costly tale of a single word in a banking contract
  • Courts are required to consider the ordinary meaning of words used in the context of the contract as a whole and the relevant factual and commercial background, excluding prior negotiations.
  • The aim is objectively to identify the intention of the parties, ie, what a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would have been available to the parties, would have understood them to mean by using the language in the contract.
  • Interpretation is an iterative process in which rival interpretations should be tested against the provisions of the contract and its commercial consequences.

Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty had no doubt about the meaning of words: ‘When I use a word… it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.’ For, as he saw it, it was simply a question of personal autonomy: ‘The question is… which is to be master—that’s all.’ However, unlike Humpty (who had the luxury of being a mere imaginative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll