header-logo header-logo

10 September 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Opinion , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Choppy waters

27140
Jon Robins highlights the clashes between government & ‘activist lawyers’ over the treatment of migrants

A short video posted from the Home Office Twitter account at the end of last month blamed EU regulations for ‘allowing activist lawyers to delay and disrupt returns’ of migrants. The government had been thwarted in its plans to put 23 migrants who had arrived in the UK on small boats on a charter flight to Spain. The video, described by The Times as resembling the opening sequence of the BBC sitcom Dad’s Army with arrows indicating ‘British forces attacking Nazi-occupied Europe’, was swiftly taken down.

The idea of activism being demeaned by government as a professional flaw predictably incensed the legal Twitterati: ‘ “Activist lawyers” again? Really? Doing your job is now activism, it seems,’ tweeted the Bar Council. ‘We are wondering what an “activist Home Secretary” does.’

Matthew Rycroft, permanent secretary at the Home Office, admitted that officials should not have used the phrase; however the home secretary waded in asserting people who had arrived

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll