header-logo header-logo

10 September 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Opinion , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Choppy waters

27140
Jon Robins highlights the clashes between government & ‘activist lawyers’ over the treatment of migrants

A short video posted from the Home Office Twitter account at the end of last month blamed EU regulations for ‘allowing activist lawyers to delay and disrupt returns’ of migrants. The government had been thwarted in its plans to put 23 migrants who had arrived in the UK on small boats on a charter flight to Spain. The video, described by The Times as resembling the opening sequence of the BBC sitcom Dad’s Army with arrows indicating ‘British forces attacking Nazi-occupied Europe’, was swiftly taken down.

The idea of activism being demeaned by government as a professional flaw predictably incensed the legal Twitterati: ‘ “Activist lawyers” again? Really? Doing your job is now activism, it seems,’ tweeted the Bar Council. ‘We are wondering what an “activist Home Secretary” does.’

Matthew Rycroft, permanent secretary at the Home Office, admitted that officials should not have used the phrase; however the home secretary waded in asserting people who had arrived

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll