header-logo header-logo

18 September 2014
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CILEx policy recommendations

Judicial review, privatisation of the courts and legal apprenticeships are among 27 policy recommendations set out for the next government by the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx).

The measures, covering 11 policy areas, have been launched this week to coincide with the last party conferences before the May 2015 General Election.

They include a promise not to privatise court functions—in May 2013, the Ministry of Justice floated an idea to privatise the courts, using a Royal Charter to maintain their independence while hiving off the court buildings and staff contracts to private companies. However, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling appeared to rule out privatisation in a statement in March.

On judicial review, CILEx wants costs restrictions on oral permission hearings to be lifted and a guarantee that the permission stage of applications will be funded, and no change to the current discretionary powers of judges. It calls for an immediate review of the legal aid reforms that were introduced in April 2013, and a government education drive to inform the public on what legal aid is still available. It also wants age restrictions lifted on legal apprenticeships so that over-24 year olds are eligible for funding, and further development of the apprenticeship system.

CILEx president Frances Edwards says: “We ask politicians and policy formers of all parties to adopt these proposals that will help build skills to maintain the UK legal sector’s global competiveness, and support vulnerable people to ensure they can meaningfully access justice.”

Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll