header-logo header-logo

07 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

City litigators defend exemption

Too soon to scrap the Commercial Court’s exemption from automatic costs budgeting

It is too soon to scrap the Commercial Court’s exemption from automatic costs budgeting, City litigation lawyers have argued in a staunch defence of the status quo.

Lord Justice Jackson recommended the exemption when he wrote his review of civil litigation costs. In June, however, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) proposed that the exemption be scrapped as it “may be unnecessary and inappropriate”.

The City of London Law Society litigation committee has now called for the exemption to remain in place, in its response to the CPRC proposal. 

The City litigators’ group, argues that: “Any change to the CPR should be based on evidence, and there is no evidence that automatic costs budgeting is either needed or wanted in commercial litigation of the sort conducted in the Commercial Court—indeed, the evidence is firmly in the opposite direction.”

Issue: 7572 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll