header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Civil actions against the police

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
08 June 2018 / Dijen Basu KC
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7796_basu

Dijen Basu QC looks at the broadening scope of claims against the police

  • The scope of claims which may be brought against police has widened.
  • The Supreme Court has clarified the duty of care owed by police for positive acts in operational situations.

Time was when it was considered by practitioners that, for reasons of public policy, save in exceptional circumstances, the police owed no duty of care to victims, witnesses or others in relation to operational policing, so that claims could not be brought for damages for ‘operational negligence’ (see, eg Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53, (a claim brought by the mother of a victim of the ‘Yorkshire Ripper’ who would not have been murdered, had he been apprehended sooner) and Brooks v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2005] 1 WLR 1495, (a claim brought by Duwayne Brooks, the teenager with Stephen Lawrence when he was murdered 25 years ago)).

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (and the Human Rights

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Police, contempt and the rule of law
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
NLJ this week: When your brain signs the contract
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
NLJ this week: Comparators—how close is close enough?
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
NLJ this week: Domicile—more than where you live
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
NLJ this week: Arbitration’s fast lane—with guardrails
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll