header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Justice Council shares recommendations for guideline hourly rates

35134
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has published its recommended guideline hourly rates for solicitors, along with points for consultation
The recommendations were produced by a working group led by Mr Justice Stewart, which began seeking evidence in August 2020 (check). The rates are a guideline figure for a reasonable charge per hour for work on a case, and provide a starting point for judges when considering costs. They are banded according to geographical location (London 1,2,3 and National 1,2) and experience of practitioner (Grade A-D).

Recommended increases vary from (London 1) £512 (25.2%) for Grade A to £186 (34.8%) for Grade D to (National 2) £255 (26.78%) for Grade A to £126 (13.5%) for Grade D.

Stewart J’s report notes that future reviews should take into account ‘changes in working practice brought about by new technology, the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic and the HMCTS reform programme’.

The guideline hourly rates have not changed since 2010―previous recommendations made by a costs committee chaired by Mr Justice Foskett were not taken up by the Master of the Rolls in 2015 due to a lack of responses from law firms.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said: ‘Guideline hourly rates for solicitors have not been changed in over ten years and were long overdue a review.

‘Revised rates would give both solicitors and their clients greater clarity about costs and we look forward to responding to the consultation points raised in the report. Although this report has been carried out as a standalone piece of work, it will be important to consider these changes in the context of other civil justice reforms including the Ministry of Justice’s work on fixed recoverable costs and the wider HMCTS reform programme.’

Association of Costs Lawyers chair Claire Green said: ‘It is unarguable that the GHRs need to be increased after a decade-long freeze.

‘Deciding on new rates is no easy task. The working group describes its proposed increases as ‘modest’ and if nothing else that will hopefully aid their approval should they be the final figures recommended to the Master of the Rolls.

‘The report also makes some welcome tweaks to the regime, most notably by re-categorising London 1 and London 2 bands to reflect the type of work done rather than a firm’s postcode, and ensuring that every part of the country outside the capital is specifically allocated to a band.

‘The working group notes that, back in 2015, the then Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, accepted the recommendation that suitably qualified costs lawyers should be eligible for grades B and C. Implementation of this, and recognition of the value of our work, is now long overdue.’

The consultation on the recommendations is open until 31 March 2021. See: bit.ly/3sgwFUv.

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll