header-logo header-logo

Civil Justice Council shares recommendations for guideline hourly rates

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
35134
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has published its recommended guideline hourly rates for solicitors, along with points for consultation
The recommendations were produced by a working group led by Mr Justice Stewart, which began seeking evidence in August 2020 (check). The rates are a guideline figure for a reasonable charge per hour for work on a case, and provide a starting point for judges when considering costs. They are banded according to geographical location (London 1,2,3 and National 1,2) and experience of practitioner (Grade A-D).

Recommended increases vary from (London 1) £512 (25.2%) for Grade A to £186 (34.8%) for Grade D to (National 2) £255 (26.78%) for Grade A to £126 (13.5%) for Grade D.

Stewart J’s report notes that future reviews should take into account ‘changes in working practice brought about by new technology, the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic and the HMCTS reform programme’.

The guideline hourly rates have not changed since 2010―previous recommendations made by a costs committee chaired by Mr Justice Foskett were not taken up by the Master of the Rolls in 2015 due to a lack of responses from law firms.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said: ‘Guideline hourly rates for solicitors have not been changed in over ten years and were long overdue a review.

‘Revised rates would give both solicitors and their clients greater clarity about costs and we look forward to responding to the consultation points raised in the report. Although this report has been carried out as a standalone piece of work, it will be important to consider these changes in the context of other civil justice reforms including the Ministry of Justice’s work on fixed recoverable costs and the wider HMCTS reform programme.’

Association of Costs Lawyers chair Claire Green said: ‘It is unarguable that the GHRs need to be increased after a decade-long freeze.

‘Deciding on new rates is no easy task. The working group describes its proposed increases as ‘modest’ and if nothing else that will hopefully aid their approval should they be the final figures recommended to the Master of the Rolls.

‘The report also makes some welcome tweaks to the regime, most notably by re-categorising London 1 and London 2 bands to reflect the type of work done rather than a firm’s postcode, and ensuring that every part of the country outside the capital is specifically allocated to a band.

‘The working group notes that, back in 2015, the then Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, accepted the recommendation that suitably qualified costs lawyers should be eligible for grades B and C. Implementation of this, and recognition of the value of our work, is now long overdue.’

The consultation on the recommendations is open until 31 March 2021. See: bit.ly/3sgwFUv.

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll