header-logo header-logo

02 June 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Civil legal aid: follow the money

124248
Roger Smith sets out a vision for a national legal aid service—& how we might go about funding it

The Ministry of Justice fared ill under the Osborne-Cameron austerity cuts. As we now enter a new political age—whatever the result of the general election next year—we have to work out a sensible way of going forward from what, frankly, is a mess. This is amply exemplified by the state of civil legal aid.

The cuts’ initial impact, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies, would have reduced departmental spending by 40%. In the event, this proved too much even for the most gung ho of treasury ministers. The cuts finally plateaued at around 25%—though not before we got the (now revoked) privatisation of the Probation Service and a chaotic court modernisation programme. We also got the evisceration of civil legal aid through the ill-famed Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.

Civil legal aid contributed a pretty exact share to the departmental cuts. Its spending declined from £1.3bn

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll