header-logo header-logo

CIVIL LITIGATION

29 February 2008
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

National Westminster Bank Plc v King [2008] EWHC 280 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 292 (Feb)

A charging order securing a sum of over £39,000 was made. An application was made to the High Court for an order that the property be sold. A chancery master transferred the matter to the county court (despite the fact that the county court limit is fixed at £30,000).

The issue to be determined was whether or not the High Court has the power, under the County Courts Act 1984, s 40(2) to transfer proceedings to the county court even if those proceedings would otherwise fall outside the jurisdiction of the county court.

HELD It is in keeping with the modern policy of assigning cases to the appropriate tier in the court system that the High Court should have an unlimited power of transfer. This power is not limited to cases which would otherwise be within a county court’s jurisdiction.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll