header-logo header-logo

Civil procedure—Time—Extension of time

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hallam Estates Ltd and another v Baker [2014] EWCA Civ 661, [2014] All ER (D) 163 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Justice Jackson, Lord Justice Lewison and Lord Justice Christopher Clarke, 19 May 2014

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, has given guidance on changes to the CPR in respect of applications to extend time.

Imran Benson (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the claimants. Jonathan Lewis (instructed by Griffin Law Ltd) for the defendant.

The claimants brought proceedings for defamation. Their action was dismissed in 2012, and they were ordered to pay costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed. The judge also ordered the claimants to pay £15,000 on account by 1 June 2012. The claimants paid part of that sum in time, but not the full amount until early October 2012. The defendant’s bill of costs totalled £86,500. She had previously indicated that it would be £72,600. The claimants’ points of dispute were to be served by 14 May 2013. The claimants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll