header-logo header-logo

Civil questions answered

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Solicitors consistently raised three questions on Professor Dominic Regan’s annual civil procedure tour, Regan writes in NLJ this week.

They concerned Part 36 offers, how difficult it is to get relief from sanctions, and how to determine whether costs are appropriate.

Giving answers, Regan, who advised Lord Justice Jackson on civil justice costs reform, advises that ‘the deadly trap within Part 36 is that an offer, once made, stays made. It doesn’t lapse through the passage of time’.

For those facing sanctions, he suggests they ‘remedy the lapse as fast as you can and simultaneously make an application for relief… explain how default occurred. It is compelling to point out, if you can, that the breach was innocent and not disruptive’.

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll