header-logo header-logo

Civil questions answered

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Solicitors consistently raised three questions on Professor Dominic Regan’s annual civil procedure tour, Regan writes in NLJ this week.

They concerned Part 36 offers, how difficult it is to get relief from sanctions, and how to determine whether costs are appropriate.

Giving answers, Regan, who advised Lord Justice Jackson on civil justice costs reform, advises that ‘the deadly trap within Part 36 is that an offer, once made, stays made. It doesn’t lapse through the passage of time’.

For those facing sanctions, he suggests they ‘remedy the lapse as fast as you can and simultaneously make an application for relief… explain how default occurred. It is compelling to point out, if you can, that the breach was innocent and not disruptive’.

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll