header-logo header-logo

Procedural nightmares

15 November 2018 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

​Dominic Regan provides some answers to the civil procedure worries keeping you up at night

Every October, I visit six cities and deliver a lengthy annual review of civil procedure. This year, the same three concerns were raised at every venue. What follows are my answers to those questions.

How do I ensure that Pt 36 doesn’t trip me up?

It is astonishing to think that so far this year we have had over a dozen reported decisions on the measure, five from the Court of Appeal, and another High Court judgment is imminent.

First things first: one must abide by the requirements of the provision. The safest way to make a compliant offer is by using the court form of offer, the N242A. Use of the form is not mandatory, but the benefit is that it helpfully prompts the offeror as to what is required, such as a relevant period of at least 21 days. Do not seek to adjust the measures enshrined in the Rule.

The deadly trap within Pt 36 is that an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll