header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 January 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Company , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 23 January 2009

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Litigious back-scratching in Europe
The lack of success fee
Fast track limit up

 

C’est Magnifique
Two new creatures for cross-border claims out of the European womb—the EOP (European Order for Payment) and the ESCP (the European Small Claims Procedure). The e EOP procedure is incorporated in Regulation 1896/2006/ EC of 12 July 2006 and the ESCP in Regulation 861/2007/EC of 11 July 2007. Both procedures have been brought into force in the UK. The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/ 2178) introduced provisions operating alongside the regulations (see CPR and PD 78 and prescribed forms with 47th update). The e EOP procedure kicked off on 12 December 2008 and the ESCP on 1 January 2009. They are both without prejudice to existing cross-border procedures and apply throughout the EC subject to the customary opting out by Denmark thereby avoiding double Dutch pleading. Accommodating jurisdictional changes have been made by the High Court and County Court Jurisdiction (Amendment) Order
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll