header-logo header-logo

01 July 2022 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 1 July 2022

Cross at court; 9.25% interesting; One-way judgment attack; 18 plus and sch 1; Who pays for the ATE?; Divorce update

YOUR COURT NEEDS YOU!!

The cross-examination loving ss 65/6 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (DAA 2021) did not achieve commencement last month as we had foolishly predicted would happen, although we remain under starter’s orders. If they are not in by the end of this month then, once more, I am a banana. What has emerged is that for advocates recently returned from a Red Square branch office and with nothing else to do, work as court appointed qualified legal representatives (QLRs) looks set to emerge from court building ears.

In family proceedings, where a party has been cautioned for, charged with or convicted of a specified offence (under the laws of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland and there are 14 pages of them in SI 2022/568), they cannot cross-examine the victim in person or vice versa. Ditto in civil proceedings except where there has been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll