header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 October 2019
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 1 November 2019

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
No dancing in the dark; whistleblowing ears; powers of attorney fail test; costs management escape.

Claimants to show all

We recently met the tribunal claimant who was desperate to maintain his anonymity (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 4 October 2019 p24). This time, with your leave, we shall introduce you to AAA and eight other QBD claimants with similar cyphers who lap-dance at Spearmint Rhino venues and who have brought proceedings for misuse of private information and data protection breach. Anonymity is what they were after but not an order that would prohibit their real names being published or from being identified as claimants in the proceedings. That led to Nicklin J struggling to see the point of the relief being sought in AAA and others v Rakoff and others [2019] EWHC 2525 (QB), [2019] All ER (D) 01 (Oct) where, absent an appeal, the title is set to expand. Anonymity was declined.

The case is instructive on keeping the red tops at bay. A claim form must contain the claimant’s full name

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll