header-logo header-logo

22 April 2016
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 22 April 2016

Forgiveness is rationed; HMRC: Licence to plunder; Knives out for solicitors’ agents; & Family Rules OK!

HARD TIMES FOR DEFAULTERS

Premium quote

Here’s a quote for you to relish and pull out at the least possible provocation. It is a quality quote because it fell from the lips of Vos LJ. “The court cannot ignore that insurers are professional litigants who can properly be held responsible for any blatant disregard of their own commercial interests.” It fell in the personal injury case of Gentry v Miller and another [2016] EWCA Civ 141, [2016] All ER (D) 107 (Mar) where the Court of Appeal reminded that the Denton test on sanction relief also applied to an application to set aside a default judgment. It additionally suggested that the very same test would apply to a CPR 39.3 application to set aside after a failure to attend.

In Gentry an assessment of damages at £75,000 with costs at £13,000 had followed a default judgment with neither the defendant driving tortfeaser nor his insurers participating. The insurers had previously

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll