header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 26 September 2008

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Procedure & practice

The mean deem

The deemed date of service of a claim form under r 6.7 is irrebuttable. It could even be on a Sunday when there are no postal deliveries. Or it could be on a date after which service was effected. So tough if, say, a claim form is deemed served outside the four-month period for service when it was actually served within it—especially if the claim is statute barred. Amendments to r 7.5 require despatch, ie posting, leaving with or collection by the relevant service provider, rather than receipt of the claim form within four months (“before midnight on the calendar day four months after the date of issue of the claim form” which should lead to some mind boggling arguments about the precise time at which the claimant shoved his hand into the postbox and whether his wristwatch may have been slow). The defendant's time for acknowledging service and filing a defence will then depend on the date of deemed service.

The business of service

A standard period

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
back-to-top-scroll