header-logo header-logo

14 August 2026 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8174 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 14 August 2026

Uninterested; TCC abhors rancour; Struck with case management; FPR update no 3 of 2026; Family listing

FROM RUSSIA WITH INTEREST

Failing to plead interest is a highly risky omission. But never say never. Yes, I know that CPR 16.2 provides that interest ‘must’ be pleaded. However, CPR Pt 16 does not apply to Pt 8 claims, which in Timokhin v Timokhina [2026] EWHC 1194 (KB)—concerned with recognition and enforcement of Russian judgments for over £417,000—was a pretty powerful reason to award the claimant unpleaded interest as it was indeed a Pt 8 claim. Nevertheless, Mr Justice Dexter Dias would have awarded it anyway. There was no prejudice alleged by virtue of the omission and none discernible. And there’s a Court of Appeal decision which could get you out of a hole, as cited in Timokhin, to wit El Ajou v Stern [2006] EWCA Civ 165 in which Lord Justice Carnwath (as he then was) stated that the CPR regulated the statutory power to award interest. They did not take

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll