header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 14 July 2023

14 July 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8033 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-detail
Service without a seal; reducing tax penalties; no jokes: the Glancing blow; coughing impecuniosity; actuarial bunfight; chancery talk.

LOOK NO SEAL

For £10,000, you would have thought the fees office at the Royal Courts of Justice would stick the court seal on the claims form, wouldn’t you? An unsealed claims form is about as good as a teabag without a cup. The Court of Appeal did not put it exactly like that in the second-tier appeal in Walton v Pickerings Solicitors and another [2023] EWCA Civ 602. What they did say was that on issue of proceedings, the court must seal the claim form (CPR 2.6(1)(a)) to indicate that it has been issued, so that until sealing there has been no issue and the proceedings have not been started. The claimant’s copies of his claim form, which were handed back to him in return for his cheque, were unsealed but, nevertheless, he served them. When in due course he got copies from the court—there were some changes from the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll