header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 14 July 2023

14 July 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8033 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-detail
Service without a seal; reducing tax penalties; no jokes: the Glancing blow; coughing impecuniosity; actuarial bunfight; chancery talk.

LOOK NO SEAL

For £10,000, you would have thought the fees office at the Royal Courts of Justice would stick the court seal on the claims form, wouldn’t you? An unsealed claims form is about as good as a teabag without a cup. The Court of Appeal did not put it exactly like that in the second-tier appeal in Walton v Pickerings Solicitors and another [2023] EWCA Civ 602. What they did say was that on issue of proceedings, the court must seal the claim form (CPR 2.6(1)(a)) to indicate that it has been issued, so that until sealing there has been no issue and the proceedings have not been started. The claimant’s copies of his claim form, which were handed back to him in return for his cheque, were unsealed but, nevertheless, he served them. When in due course he got copies from the court—there were some changes from the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll