header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 29 September 2017

CPR updated 92nd time, new PD on child abuse, QOCS skirmish

The latest CPR changes hit us on 1 October 2017 as the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2017 (SI 2017/889) come into force presented as the 92nd update and two Practice Directions (PDs) to complement are awaited.

Division 2 There may be cases which require the brains and intellect of a judge from two or more divisions of the High Court such as those involving matrimonial property where family and chancery might have—and have had—different ideas. In that situation, CPR 3.1 is amended to explicitly allow something which has been regarded as implicitly permissible, namely a case management direction that a hearing may proceed before a Divisional Court comprising judges who may come from different divisions and they can then have a public punch up which is likely to be an all ticket affair.

Roll up Just in case a pedant suggests that a 2016 amendment to CPR 52 may have done away with the court’s power to roll up an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll