header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 19 September 2008

Procedure & practice

The Court of Appeal has deftly overcome a small claims track restricted costs hurdle which habitually presents itself in housing disrepair cases. Enter Lee v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 891, [2008] All ER (D) 423 (Jul). Hurdle? The tenant follows the pre-action protocol for housing disrepair cases; the landlord carries out the necessary repairs; and the tenant then makes a claim for damages but without seeking relief by way of specific performance because this is by now unnecessary; and the claim being for less than £5,000 without specific performance, it is allocated to the small claims track. You can guess the rest.

In the event of the landlord losing or settling, it argues that it is only liable for small claims costs and not for what would probably have been substantially higher costs if, with a specific performance claim, the proceedings had been allocated to the fast track.

It was held by the Court of Appeal that since the promulgation of the protocol, it is no longer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll