header-logo header-logo

15 November 2024 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 15 November 2024

ORs needs more money; Small claims crack pilot grows; Judges rule at tribunals, OK!; FDRs: no escape; 3 October 2024

IT’S ALL THE ADMIN, YOU SEE

Less money for creditors after the official receiver (OR) has taken their cut. The Insolvency Proceedings (Fees) (Amendment) Order 2014 (SI 2014/963) which comes into force on 9 January 2025 increases their remuneration. For administration, their fee on bankruptcy following a debtor’s application is up from £1,990 to £2,390; following a creditor’s petition from £2,775 to £3,300; on a winding up under s124A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (on public interest grounds thanks to a secretary of state’s petition so they will be paying themselves) from £7,500 to a massive £13,500; and on any other winding up from £5,000 to £6,000. The general fee for costs not recovered out of the administration fee rises from £6,000 to £7,200. The deposit payable on a s 124A petition and which is security for the administration fee is up from £5,000 to £13,500.

Other OR hourly rates are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll