header-logo header-logo

23 February 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 February 2018

HMRC antidote; Hug a claims management co.; 94th CPR update

 

LAX ON TAX

You have missed the deadline for getting in your 2016–17 tax return or paying your tax? Let’s see if we can help with more than a cursory nod of thanks to the judges of the tax chamber. For the avoidance of doubt, HMRC do not lose every time. Just quite a bit. Incidentally, you can now make a tax appeal on line at www.gov.uk/tax-tribunal. Come this spring, you may be invited to participate in the video hearing pilot for tax appeals for which ‘the majesty of the courtroom will be upheld.’ Bow to the web cam. More next time.

It was the computer what did it The determination to impose a penalty for the late filing of a company tax return was invalid because it had not been made by a flesh and blood tax officer as required by s 100(1) of the Taxes Management Act 1970. It appeared that the HMRC computer was programmed to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll