header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 2 June 2023

02 June 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR , Fees
printer mail-detail
Short-changing the court; overseas and watched; standard orders ready; (till the next time); too much relief.

RETURN OF THE ASS

The claimants’ solicitors authorised the county court at Central London to debit the court fee from their PBA account when they sought to issue Pt 8 proceedings by post in Peterson and another v Howard De Walden Estates Ltd [2023] EWHC 929 (KB), [2023] All ER (D) 29 (May). Alas, the authority was for £24 short of the prescribed fee and so court staff bounced back. That fatally meant that the deadline for applying for an order under s 48(3) of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993) was missed. The claimants sought relief under CPR 3.10, which gives the court power to rectify where there has been an ‘error of procedure’. Mr Justice Eyre, on appeal, affirmed the decision below, holding that there was no jurisdiction to grant relief as, although CPR 3.10 could be used to remedy defects in the form of proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll