header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 2 June 2023

02 June 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR , Fees
printer mail-detail
Short-changing the court; overseas and watched; standard orders ready; (till the next time); too much relief.

RETURN OF THE ASS

The claimants’ solicitors authorised the county court at Central London to debit the court fee from their PBA account when they sought to issue Pt 8 proceedings by post in Peterson and another v Howard De Walden Estates Ltd [2023] EWHC 929 (KB), [2023] All ER (D) 29 (May). Alas, the authority was for £24 short of the prescribed fee and so court staff bounced back. That fatally meant that the deadline for applying for an order under s 48(3) of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993) was missed. The claimants sought relief under CPR 3.10, which gives the court power to rectify where there has been an ‘error of procedure’. Mr Justice Eyre, on appeal, affirmed the decision below, holding that there was no jurisdiction to grant relief as, although CPR 3.10 could be used to remedy defects in the form of proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll