header-logo header-logo

Civil Way: 22 May 2020

20 May 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

COVID-19

Spot the liar It is not possible to say as a generality whether a witness is telling the truth in court rather than remotely. That was the conclusion of Lieven J in the care fact-finding case of A Local Authority v Mother and others [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam). Demeanour would often not be a good guide to truthfulness. Some people were better at lying than others and that would be no different whether they did so remotely or in court. Demeanour in court would often be more obvious to the judge but that did not mean it would be more illuminating. Might a witness be more likely to tell the truth if they were in the witness box and felt the pressure of the courtroom? This could work the other way round. They might feel less defensive and be more inclined to tell the truth in a remote hearing than when feeling somewhat intimidated in court. In the absence of empirical evidence, she could reach no conclusion on what forum was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll