header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 22 May 2020

COVID-19

Spot the liar It is not possible to say as a generality whether a witness is telling the truth in court rather than remotely. That was the conclusion of Lieven J in the care fact-finding case of A Local Authority v Mother and others [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam). Demeanour would often not be a good guide to truthfulness. Some people were better at lying than others and that would be no different whether they did so remotely or in court. Demeanour in court would often be more obvious to the judge but that did not mean it would be more illuminating. Might a witness be more likely to tell the truth if they were in the witness box and felt the pressure of the courtroom? This could work the other way round. They might feel less defensive and be more inclined to tell the truth in a remote hearing than when feeling somewhat intimidated in court. In the absence of empirical evidence, she could reach no conclusion on what forum was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll