header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 22 May 2020

COVID-19

Spot the liar It is not possible to say as a generality whether a witness is telling the truth in court rather than remotely. That was the conclusion of Lieven J in the care fact-finding case of A Local Authority v Mother and others [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam). Demeanour would often not be a good guide to truthfulness. Some people were better at lying than others and that would be no different whether they did so remotely or in court. Demeanour in court would often be more obvious to the judge but that did not mean it would be more illuminating. Might a witness be more likely to tell the truth if they were in the witness box and felt the pressure of the courtroom? This could work the other way round. They might feel less defensive and be more inclined to tell the truth in a remote hearing than when feeling somewhat intimidated in court. In the absence of empirical evidence, she could reach no conclusion on what forum was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll