header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 28 July 2023

28 July 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-detail
Cross-examiner crisis; new possession help; interest on costs; bank liability for fraud.

ABOUT TURN

Need a few bob? Frequent and widespread difficulties are being encountered in finding advocates to act as qualified legal representatives (QLRs) to cross-examine vulnerable witnesses under ss 65–66 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (see ‘Civil way’, 172 NLJ 7985, p15). We know because the president of the family division has reported on this serious state of affairs. In this month’s View from the President’s Chambers, he suggests that if there are no takers within 28 days, the court should list the case for directions and direct that some summary information is provided by HMCTS about the difficulties that have been encountered. FPR PD 3AB, para 8.1(b) permits termination of a QLR appointment. Giving consideration to termination, he says, will provide a further opportunity to canvas any other options such as directly instructing an advocate. Notwithstanding the guidance that the court should not itself conduct the cross-examination, this did not trump the overriding objective

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll