TENANT FEES TRAP AVOIDED
While in breach of the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (TFA 2019), a landlord may be paralysed from serving a s 21, Housing Act 1988 notice (they haven’t gone yet, folks) and any possession claim made on the strength of such a notice will be kicked out. But is there the same paralysis as a result of a payment required and made under an earlier tenancy for the premises between the same parties which was entered into before TFA 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019, but which would have been prohibited under TFA 2019? That was the issue in Switaj v McClenaghan [2024] EWCA Civ 1457, leapfrogged to the Court of Appeal because of its importance. The tenant’s primary argument was that the position was analogous with that in the much-hated Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues [2013] EWCA Civ 669 on tenancy deposits, where the terms of the
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=16d9dd3d_1)
