header-logo header-logo

29 January 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 31 January 2020

Distressing for landlords

The lessor’s common law self-help right of distress was replaced by the commercial rent arrears recovery scheme (CRAR). This was introduced by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 with the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/1894) poking their noses in. The scheme is only available in relation to commercial premises. At least seven days’ rent must be unpaid.

Common law distress amounted to a waiver of the right to forfeit. But what of the exercise of CRAR? Over to Brar and another v Thirunavukkrasu [2019] EWCA Civ 20132 where enforcement agents took control in the lessee’s shop on behalf of the lessor for £10,533 of rent and fees which the lessee stumped up three days later. Six days after that, the lessor purported to forfeit. The lessee brought proceedings claiming a declaration as to the unlawfulness of the forfeiture and damages. The Court of Appeal ruled that the lessor had waived their right to forfeit. CRAR in principle amounted to an unequivocal act confirming the lessor’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll