header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 31 January 2020

29 January 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Distressing for landlords

The lessor’s common law self-help right of distress was replaced by the commercial rent arrears recovery scheme (CRAR). This was introduced by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 with the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/1894) poking their noses in. The scheme is only available in relation to commercial premises. At least seven days’ rent must be unpaid.

Common law distress amounted to a waiver of the right to forfeit. But what of the exercise of CRAR? Over to Brar and another v Thirunavukkrasu [2019] EWCA Civ 20132 where enforcement agents took control in the lessee’s shop on behalf of the lessor for £10,533 of rent and fees which the lessee stumped up three days later. Six days after that, the lessor purported to forfeit. The lessee brought proceedings claiming a declaration as to the unlawfulness of the forfeiture and damages. The Court of Appeal ruled that the lessor had waived their right to forfeit. CRAR in principle amounted to an unequivocal act confirming the lessor’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll