header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 19 February 2010

Soaring fees; Drug addicts: bad news; Witness immunity; TOLATA beats AR

Soaring fees

“It’s a blasted covenant job.” If you’ve got business for the Lands Tribunal, take it there before October 2010. That’s when the level of its fees is set to soar so that one-half of running costs is recovered. Fees have remained static since 1996. A Tribunals Service consultation paper reveals what’s in store. Take applications to discharge or modify restrictive covenants. The lodgement fee will jump from £200 to £800—it is said that these applications are hugely time consuming for Registrars as they typically involve reviewing plans and lengthy documents—and the final hearing fee from £350 to £1,000. Right of light certificate applications are also said to be time consuming. They are planned to leap from £250 and £350 to £1,200 and £1,500.

Drug addicts: bad news

Trust lawyers have a spring in their step or are as white as a sheet, depending on age. They’ve got some new law. The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009—created by the Law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll