header-logo header-logo

Civil Way

Liability

CONCERTINA: THE NON-MUSICAL

KIND

There has been a valiant attempt at establishing liability by a driver who was not within braking distance of a suddenly halting vehicle ahead in Sharp v Ministry of Defence [2007] EWCA Civ 1223, [2007] All ER (D) 417 (Nov).

 

Emergency stop

Ten vehicles were in convoy. V1 came to a steady halt. V2 stopped safely after braking harder than usual. V3 braked sharply. V4 halted normally. V5 and V6 carried out emergency stops, coming to rest a half a metre between them. V7 made an emergency stop but a protruding load of V6 penetrated the cab, grievously injuring the claimant driver of V7 and killing his passenger. The claimant alleged that the Ministry of Defence was liable for the negligence of the drivers of V5 and V6. Lord Justice Sedley said it was apparent that all drivers in the convoy, at least as far back as V8, were caught up in the concertina effect when the lead vehicle unexpectedly halted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll