header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 March 2009 / Stephen Gold
Categories: Legal News , Damages , Professional negligence , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Civil Way

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Liability

CONCERTINA: THE NON-MUSICAL

KIND

There has been a valiant attempt at establishing liability by a driver who was not within braking distance of a suddenly halting vehicle ahead in Sharp v Ministry of Defence [2007] EWCA Civ 1223, [2007] All ER (D) 417 (Nov).

 

Emergency stop

Ten vehicles were in convoy. V1 came to a steady halt. V2 stopped safely after braking harder than usual. V3 braked sharply. V4 halted normally. V5 and V6 carried out emergency stops, coming to rest a half a metre between them. V7 made an emergency stop but a protruding load of V6 penetrated the cab, grievously injuring the claimant driver of V7 and killing his passenger. The claimant alleged that the Ministry of Defence was liable for the negligence of the drivers of V5 and V6. Lord Justice Sedley said it was apparent that all drivers in the convoy, at least as far back as V8, were caught up in the concertina effect when the lead vehicle unexpectedly halted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll