header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 9 March 2007

09 March 2007 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Tenancy deposits scheme - landlords beware, The Court of Appeal reports, Danger in the TCC, Payments in - the end

LET EARLY FOR EASTER

The tenancy deposit scheme (see www.communities.gov.uk/tenancydeposit) arrives on 6 April 2007 with the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004), ss 212–214 and Sch 10 due to be brought into force along with the Housing (Tenancy Deposit Schemes) Order 2007 (draft SI 2007/5748). The scheme will catch any tenancy deposit—money intended to be held by the landlord or otherwise as security for the performance of any obligations of the tenant or the discharge of any liability—in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy (it is reckoned that £695 is the average amount handed over) where the deposit is received on or after 6 April 2007.

Spot the difference

There are three approved schemes: a custodial scheme, where tenants pay landlords and landlords pay the deposits into the scheme, run by the Deposit Protection Service, which is free to landlords and letting agents; and two insurance schemes, where tenants pay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll