header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 18 June 2010

17 June 2010 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Case law , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

NOT BOTHERED; FEWER FACTS PART II; IT’S BACK

Whatshisname?

How to address a tribunal judge—otherwise than behind his back—may present a dilemma. Have no fear. The Senior President of Tribunals has just come out with revised guidance. In hearing rooms they should continue to be called “Sir” or “Madam” which is the practice even in the EAT when a High Court or circuit judge is presiding. In the Upper Tribunal when a judge is referred to in, for example, a decision document or after signature, the handle “Upper Tribunal Judge X” should be used. The titles of “chamber president” and “deputy chamber president” should be given in full but may be abbreviated to “CP” and “DCP” in the course of a decision. High Court and circuit judges sitting in the Upper Tribunal are to be referred to by their court titles (if you expect to encounter a Lord Justice of Appeal at a cocktail party or in an ice-cream or bus queue this summer then NLJ 15 February 2008, p 258

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll