header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 18 June 2010

17 June 2010 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Case law , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

NOT BOTHERED; FEWER FACTS PART II; IT’S BACK

Whatshisname?

How to address a tribunal judge—otherwise than behind his back—may present a dilemma. Have no fear. The Senior President of Tribunals has just come out with revised guidance. In hearing rooms they should continue to be called “Sir” or “Madam” which is the practice even in the EAT when a High Court or circuit judge is presiding. In the Upper Tribunal when a judge is referred to in, for example, a decision document or after signature, the handle “Upper Tribunal Judge X” should be used. The titles of “chamber president” and “deputy chamber president” should be given in full but may be abbreviated to “CP” and “DCP” in the course of a decision. High Court and circuit judges sitting in the Upper Tribunal are to be referred to by their court titles (if you expect to encounter a Lord Justice of Appeal at a cocktail party or in an ice-cream or bus queue this summer then NLJ 15 February 2008, p 258

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll