header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 3 June 2011

Super bolts, super supper, super speculation & super duper deposit win

Bolt upright, please

The Family Advocacy Scheme was cursed into force on 9 May 2011, applying to cases in which the funding application was made on or after that date. Advocates will need to know their bolt-on entitlements better than their Red Book if frayed shirt collars are to be avoided.

There’s a 25% bolt-on to the hearing fee where the client (not another party) is facing allegations of significant harm to a child. In public law, the allegations must have been made by the local authority and in both public and private law, still be live. Significant harm is defined. Death is generously included as are burns and scalds and fabricated illness. Representation of a person who has difficulty giving instructions or understanding advice will also rank for a 25% bolt-on in public law children cases but only if (inter alia) verified by a report from a psychologist or psychiatrist (and not based simply on a punch-up with counsel

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll