header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 2 September 2011

When asking whether a judgment is more advantageous than a CPR Pt 36 offer, the court should take into account all aspects of the case, including emotional distress.

CARVED UP

When asking whether a judgment is more advantageous than a CPR Pt 36 offer, the court should take into account all aspects of the case, including emotional distress. That was the much criticised decision of the Court of Appeal in Carver v BAA [2008] EWCA Civ 412, [2008] 3 All ER 911. It is reversed by the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2011 (SI 2011/1979) for offers made after 30 September 2011. In relation to any money claim or money element of a claim, “more advantageous” is to mean better in money terms by any amount, however small.

TRIPLE WHAMMY

The story so far. The assured shorthold landlord can effectively protect the tenant’s deposit right up to the hearing of the tenant’s claim for the dreaded triple deposit penalty (though will almost certainly be clobbered for the tenant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll