header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 16 August 2013

14 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

The Law Society called on the government to postpone implementation of its low value road traffic personal injury claims reforms...

CIVIL DISORDER RULES

The Law Society called on the government to postpone implementation of its low value road traffic personal injury claims reforms in order to avoid major disruption to the civil justice system. That was on 11 July 2013. The reforms duly came into force on 31 July 2013 under the disarming guise of the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 6) Rules 2013 (SI 2013/1695). The rules raise the scheme’s limit from £10,000 to £25,000 and extend the scheme to catch claims for employer and public liability.

The fixed recoverable costs under the scheme in CPR Part 45 s III (see “Civil way”) are applied to employer and liability claims. For claims which exit, there is again a fixed costs regime resting in shame in new s IIIA but it will not apply to employer and public liability disease claims. The amount recoverable post-exit will be dependent on the nature of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll