header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 16 August 2013

The Law Society called on the government to postpone implementation of its low value road traffic personal injury claims reforms...

CIVIL DISORDER RULES

The Law Society called on the government to postpone implementation of its low value road traffic personal injury claims reforms in order to avoid major disruption to the civil justice system. That was on 11 July 2013. The reforms duly came into force on 31 July 2013 under the disarming guise of the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 6) Rules 2013 (SI 2013/1695). The rules raise the scheme’s limit from £10,000 to £25,000 and extend the scheme to catch claims for employer and public liability.

The fixed recoverable costs under the scheme in CPR Part 45 s III (see “Civil way”) are applied to employer and liability claims. For claims which exit, there is again a fixed costs regime resting in shame in new s IIIA but it will not apply to employer and public liability disease claims. The amount recoverable post-exit will be dependent on the nature of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll