header-logo header-logo

CJC clarifies capacity in civil proceedings

20 November 2024
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has set out detailed guidelines on evaluating and managing mental capacity—an area of procedure that was previously unclear.

The CJC set up a working group in 2022 to consider the issue. Its final report on the matter, published last week, notes ‘the absence of any clear procedure or guidance means that procedures are developed on an ad-hoc basis, which is inefficient and leads to inconsistency of approach… Moreover, a great deal of work that has to be undertaken by legal representatives, charities, and statutory bodies in supporting litigants who may lack capacity is unpaid and is unsustainable’.

The report, ‘The procedure for determining mental capacity in civil proceedings’ recommends the presumption of capacity not be used to avoid litigation capacity being determined, even if it may be difficult to obtain evidence. Other recommendations include that litigation capacity issues should be identified and determined at the first available opportunity. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll