header-logo header-logo

CJC: portal reforms should wait

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

RTA portal plans "should be put on hold until 2014"

“Unrealistic” plans to cut recoverable costs for the RTA portal, and extend the scheme, should be put on hold until at least 2014 when the civil justice reforms will have had time to bed down, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has warned.

Meanwhile, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society have jointly applied for a judicial review of the decision to cut recoverable costs. Both organisations fear their members will not be able to afford to run cases through the portal after the reforms take place.

The portal enables claimant and defendant to securely exchange information as the claim is processed through a series of stages. The proposed reforms will reduce solicitors’ recoverable costs from £1,200 to £500 for claims of less than £10,000, include employers’ and public liability cases in the scheme, and add a second band of higher value cases of up to £25,000.

This was due to happen on 1 April, but the justice secretary announced in December that he is re-considering the implementation date. A new date is yet to be set.

The CJC, an independent advisory group headed by the Master of the Rolls, noted that the abolition of referral fees in April will “not automatically” reduce a firm’s marketing spend, and in fact firms may have to spend more due the current competitive climate.

It advised that “the fixed recoverable cost regime must accurately reflect the actual amount of work that is required”, and “should reflect the varying nature of those costs, rather than the lowest possible cost.” It also expressed concern that “it may be regarded as unrealistic to expect all the necessary work and negotiations to be carried out against a fixed fee limited to £500”.

The warning echoes that of Professor Paul Fenn in July, in a report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, who called for a full review of the portal before it is extended.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll