header-logo header-logo

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CJC: portal reforms should wait

RTA portal plans "should be put on hold until 2014"

“Unrealistic” plans to cut recoverable costs for the RTA portal, and extend the scheme, should be put on hold until at least 2014 when the civil justice reforms will have had time to bed down, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has warned.

Meanwhile, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society have jointly applied for a judicial review of the decision to cut recoverable costs. Both organisations fear their members will not be able to afford to run cases through the portal after the reforms take place.

The portal enables claimant and defendant to securely exchange information as the claim is processed through a series of stages. The proposed reforms will reduce solicitors’ recoverable costs from £1,200 to £500 for claims of less than £10,000, include employers’ and public liability cases in the scheme, and add a second band of higher value cases of up to £25,000.

This was due to happen on 1 April, but the justice secretary announced in December that he is re-considering the implementation date. A new date is yet to be set.

The CJC, an independent advisory group headed by the Master of the Rolls, noted that the abolition of referral fees in April will “not automatically” reduce a firm’s marketing spend, and in fact firms may have to spend more due the current competitive climate.

It advised that “the fixed recoverable cost regime must accurately reflect the actual amount of work that is required”, and “should reflect the varying nature of those costs, rather than the lowest possible cost.” It also expressed concern that “it may be regarded as unrealistic to expect all the necessary work and negotiations to be carried out against a fixed fee limited to £500”.

The warning echoes that of Professor Paul Fenn in July, in a report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, who called for a full review of the portal before it is extended.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll