header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Limitation
printer mail-detail

Claim allowed 35 yrs on

Limitation

The High Court has allowed a £5m claim over alleged child sex abuse that happened 35 years ago to proceed.

In Raggett v Society of Jesus Trust, Mrs Justice Swift ruled that the limitation period in s 11 of the Limitation Act 1980 should be set aside, and allowed the claim to proceed on the grounds it would be equitable to do so in the circumstances.

Patrick Raggett, a former City solicitor, claims he suffered frequent and persistent child sex abuse by a Jesuit priest at his school, Father Spencer, now deceased.

He claims to have lived in a state of denial for years until a discussion about religion in 2005 triggered memories of his time at Preston Catholic College in the 1970s. He says he suffered low self-esteem, depression, heavy drinking, under-achievement in his career and difficulties forming relationships as a result of the abuse.

Jonathan Wheeler, partner, Bolt, Burdon and Kemp, says Raggetts’s case is one of the first to benefit from the House of Lords’ ruling last year in A v Hoare and others, in which Wheeler acted, where the House of Lords ruled that the time limit could be extended where it was in the interests of justice to do so.

A v Hoare overturned a Law Lords’ ruling, in Stubbings v Webb, that a strict six-year limitation period should apply in assault cases.

“This is an interesting indication of how applying A v Hoare is going to assist claimants in these types of cases,” says Wheeler.

“What we are seeing are well-funded defendants such as the Catholic Church using their vast resources to bring [limitation] up time and time again, and to stifle claims. It is excellent in this case that the judge understood the problems claimants have in coming to terms with what has happened to them.”

Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Limitation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll