header-logo header-logo

Claims controversy continues

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers hit back at ABI accusations of excessive fees & manipulation

Claimant lawyers’ groups have hit back at insurers’ claims that they “manipulate” the system, charge “excessive” fees, and leave consumers worse off.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) made the accusations in a report published this week, which was backed by business groups and retailers including Lloyd’s and Argos.

The report, Tackling the Compensation Culture, said the number of personal injury claims received by insurers rose 72% between 2002 and 2010, and that people got more compensation, typically an extra £289, quicker if they dealt with an insurer rather than a lawyer.

It blamed the “have a go compensation culture” for rising motor insurance premiums and said the NHS paid out more than £257m in lawyers’ fees as a result of claims in 2010/2011. Fraudulent and exaggerated whiplash claims can easily be made, it said, while excessive legal costs sometimes exceed the level of damages. It adds that there is no financial incentive for claimants to ensure costs are reasonable, and referral fees increase costs without adding value.

In response Andrew Dismore, co-ordinator of the Access to Justice Action Group (AJAG) said: “Cases only go to court when the insurers deny liability or refuse to pay adequate compensation. The insurers have only themselves to blame for legal costs: if they accept liability and make early reasonable offers, then the costs are contained. The ABI is in overdrive in its well financed campaign to blame the public, lawyers, and the government for rises in insurance premiums: everyone but themselves. While the ABI routinely alleges fraud, the proven number of cases is comparatively small...and there is the other side of the coin, when insurers allege spurious or fraudulent defences to deny claimants rightful compensation. Although they complain about the impact of claims, the liability insurers have not indicated by how much they would reduce premiums, or even that premiums would be reduced at all, if the changes they demand are implemented. Indeed, there is evidence that premiums may actually increase.”

Des Hudson, the Law Society’s chief executive, said the ABI report was self-serving to the insurance industry. “Lawyers exist to ensure that people get their just compensation and are not manipulated by the insurance industry. Does anyone seriously believe that insurers would pay out claims unnecessarily?”

Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll