header-logo header-logo

10 August 2015
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Claims farmer fined

A claims management company that made millions of nuisance calls has become the first to be fined under new claims management regulation powers.

The Hearing Clinic has received a fine of £220,000 from the claims management regulator, which is based at the Ministry of Justice, following hundreds of complaints from members of the public who received speculative calls about claims for noise induced hearing loss. Many of those people had subscribed to the telephone preference service, which indicates they did not want to receive such calls.

Powers to fine companies who misbehave were introduced in December 2014. Companies can be fined up to 20% of annual turnover as well as have their trading licence suspended or revoked.

Some 296 claims firms received warnings from the regulator in 2014/15 and 105 had their licences removed. The number of claims companies is believed to have fallen to 1,752, from a peak of 3,367 in 2011.

Claims management regulator Kevin Rousell says: “Companies should be in no doubt that if they break the rules then we won’t hesitate to fine them in addition to the tough action we already take.”

The Civil Justice Council has been asked to make recommendations in response to concerns about the number of noise induced hearing loss claims being brought.

 

Issue: 7665 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll