header-logo header-logo

Claims have risen since fees ended

24 September 2018
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal claims have rocketed in number since fees were abolished in July 2017, the latest Ministry of Justice (MoJ) statistics reveal.

Statistics released last week show the number of single claims lodged from April to June 2018 rose 165% to 10,996 on the same quarter the previous year when fees were charged. Multiple claims more than quadrupled, rising by 344%, although more than half of these arose as part of a large multiple airline claim.

The MoJ acknowledged that the rise was ‘most likely due to the abolition of employment tribunal fees’ since ‘receipts remained relatively stable (around 4,300 per quarter)’ from July 2013 to July 2017, when fees were charged.

The unpopular fees, from £390 to £1,200 for a single claimant, were removed following a landmark Supreme Court ruling in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 that the fees were unlawful because of their effect on access to justice. The MoJ introduced a fee refund scheme for claimants, of which 12,400 payments totalling more than £10m have been made.

Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll