header-logo header-logo

Small claims matter

01 June 2018 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7795_allen

All hail R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & the Justice Select Committee, says Patrick Allen

The House of Commons Justice Select Committee has slammed government proposals to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims in its recent forthright report (Small claims limit for personal injury, 17 May 2018).

The government had announced its intention to raise the small claims limit for general damages from £1,000 to £5,000 for claims arising from a road accident and £2,000 for other claims including accidents at work. It has just introduced the Civil Liability Bill in the House of Lords which would reduce whiplash damages to a small fraction of the Judicial Standards Board (JSB) guideline figures.

Legal costs are not recoverable in the small claims track so accident victims would not be able to instruct lawyers to help with their case, obtain medical evidence, advance court fees and value and negotiate the claim.

The Justice Select Committee received compelling evidence of the obstacles that litigants in person would face and concluded that ‘this would represent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll