header-logo header-logo

01 June 2018 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Small claims matter

nlj_7795_allen

All hail R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & the Justice Select Committee, says Patrick Allen

The House of Commons Justice Select Committee has slammed government proposals to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims in its recent forthright report (Small claims limit for personal injury, 17 May 2018).

The government had announced its intention to raise the small claims limit for general damages from £1,000 to £5,000 for claims arising from a road accident and £2,000 for other claims including accidents at work. It has just introduced the Civil Liability Bill in the House of Lords which would reduce whiplash damages to a small fraction of the Judicial Standards Board (JSB) guideline figures.

Legal costs are not recoverable in the small claims track so accident victims would not be able to instruct lawyers to help with their case, obtain medical evidence, advance court fees and value and negotiate the claim.

The Justice Select Committee received compelling evidence of the obstacles that litigants in person would face and concluded that ‘this would represent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll