header-logo header-logo

Small claims matter

01 June 2018 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7795_allen

All hail R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & the Justice Select Committee, says Patrick Allen

The House of Commons Justice Select Committee has slammed government proposals to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims in its recent forthright report (Small claims limit for personal injury, 17 May 2018).

The government had announced its intention to raise the small claims limit for general damages from £1,000 to £5,000 for claims arising from a road accident and £2,000 for other claims including accidents at work. It has just introduced the Civil Liability Bill in the House of Lords which would reduce whiplash damages to a small fraction of the Judicial Standards Board (JSB) guideline figures.

Legal costs are not recoverable in the small claims track so accident victims would not be able to instruct lawyers to help with their case, obtain medical evidence, advance court fees and value and negotiate the claim.

The Justice Select Committee received compelling evidence of the obstacles that litigants in person would face and concluded that ‘this would represent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll