header-logo header-logo

24 October 2025 / Bhavini Patel
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Leasehold , Health & safety , Construction
printer mail-detail

Clarifying ‘cladding’

233321
A landmark decision of the Upper Tribunal has widened the scope of cladding remediation: Bhavini Patel reports
  • The Upper Tribunal has given the widest interpretation to the meaning of ‘cladding’ and ‘cladding remediation’, and provided guidance on what is meant by an unsafe cladding system under the Building Safety Act 2022.
  • This provides much-needed guidance on how the leaseholder protections operate when a building has an unsafe cladding system which requires remediation.

In Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No1 Ltd and another company v De Valk and others [2025] UKUT 298 (LC), the Upper Tribunal (UT) has dismissed an appeal bought by the landlord applicant, Almacantar, ruling in favour of the leaseholders. It has given the widest interpretation to the meaning of ‘cladding’ and ‘cladding remediation’, and provided guidance on what is meant by an unsafe cladding system under the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022). This decision involves the iconic Centre Point House in Tottenham Court Road. The judgment cements the UT’s desire to uphold Michael Gove’s pledge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll